Ruins of the Future: A Walter Benjaminian Reading of Warhammer 40,000
In the grim darkness of the far future, there is only war. Yet in this fictional maxim—so bleak and hyperbolic it borders on absurdity—Walter Benjamin might have found the perfect emblem of modernity’s descent into myth, ruin, and spectacle. Warhammer 40,000 (or 40k) is a sprawling science-fantasy universe where decay masquerades as progress, war as religion, and bureaucracy as divinity. But 40k is more than lore—it is also a material hobby, a mode of production and reproduction: millions of fans paint mass-produced plastic miniatures, construct ruins, and enact endless war on tabletops. Through Benjamin’s critical lenses—particularly those articulated in The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, Theses on the Philosophy of History, and The Origin of German Tragic Drama—we can begin to uncover how Warhammer 40k operates both as a ruinous allegory of historical catastrophe and as a deeply Benjaminian aesthetic experience in its material form.
I. History as Catastrophe: The Angel of the Imperium
In his Theses on the Philosophy of History, Benjamin rejects the idea of linear historical progress. For him, “the storm we call progress” drives humanity ever forward, but only by piling wreckage upon wreckage. His famous image of Paul Klee’s painting Angelus Novus—the angel who sees history as a single unfolding catastrophe—finds uncanny resonance in the universe of Warhammer 40k. The Imperium of Man, ostensibly the defenders of humanity, are in fact the stewards of a stagnant, decaying empire locked in perpetual war. The technological advances of the past have ossified into sacred rituals; innovation is heresy; progress is blasphemy. The universe exists in a kind of frozen time, what Benjamin might call “dialectics at a standstill,” where the future is endlessly postponed, and the past is mythologized beyond recognition.
Benjamin would likely see the Imperium as a grotesque culmination of what happens when myth supplants history. The Space Marines, ecclesiastical soldiers clad in baroque armor, fight not for liberation but for preservation—of dogma, of structure, of imperial rot. Even their enemies mirror this stasis: the Chaos gods embody unchanging excesses; the Necrons are literally an ancient tomb awakened; the Eldar are haunted by the past. Warhammer 40k is not a speculative future—it is a haunted allegory of the past’s dominance over the present.
II. Aura, Reproduction, and the Plastic Miniature
Perhaps the most paradoxical expression of Benjaminian aesthetics within Warhammer 40k lies not in its lore but in its hobby practice. In The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, Benjamin argues that mass reproduction strips artworks of their “aura”—the unique presence that ties a work to a particular time, place, and ritual. However, the world of 40k appears to subvert or even invert this logic. Here, reproduction is not the death of aura, but its rebirth through performance and labor.
Plastic miniatures—mass-produced, standardized, and mechanically reproduced—are given new aura through the act of painting. The hobbyist, in applying paint to sprued figures, reenacts a ritual not unlike that of a medieval iconographer. Each miniature becomes singular again through personalization, weathering, conversion, and basing. The aura, far from vanishing, is reconstituted in a new, fragmented form. Benjamin’s dialectical image—a moment where past and present flash into visibility—might emerge in the delicate edge highlight on a Primaris Intercessor’s greave, or in the scorched flock of a Tyranid-ravaged ruin.
This is not merely a return to cult value but its mutation. The painted miniature is a devotional object, but also a commodity, a performance, and an allegorical figure. It is at once war-toy and symbolic vessel. The act of painting itself is saturated with time: hours of work for a figure meant to die on turn three. In this way, the hobbyist becomes a kind of allegorist—turning the mass-produced into the tragic, the absurd, the singular.
III. Allegory and the Baroque of the Grimdark
In The Origin of German Tragic Drama, Benjamin presents allegory as a mode of expression that emerges in times of crisis. Unlike the symbol, which unifies meaning in a transcendent whole, the allegory is fragmentary, ruinous, and historical. It reveals the brokenness of the world rather than concealing it.
Warhammer 40k is deeply allegorical in this sense. Its settings are not coherent worlds but layers of ruin and contradiction. Hive Cities stretch miles into poisoned skies while teeming with unfathomable poverty. The iconography of the Imperium is decadent, overloaded with skulls, purity seals, and rotting banners—what Benjamin would recognize as the baroque excess of a civilization in terminal decline. In every model and battlefield, we see the past haunting the present in monumental form: a cathedral-tank, a holy chainsword, a dying star system defended in vain.
Even the lore itself often operates allegorically. The Emperor is a failed Messiah, his throne a parody of resurrection. Chaos is not mere evil but a metaphysical overflow of unchecked emotion—desire, rage, decay, ambition—all the unmastered affects of late capitalism made divine. Every faction embodies a distorted fragment of modernity: the bureaucratic totalitarianism of the Imperium, the ecstatic consumption of the Tyranids, the techno-religious recursion of the Adeptus Mechanicus.
IV. Aestheticized Politics and the Spectacle of War
Benjamin warned, especially in his critique of fascism, that the aestheticization of politics—particularly the glorification of war—was one of modernity’s greatest dangers. In 40k, war is everything. It is not only eternal, it is spiritualized, sanctified, and ritualized. The Sisters of Battle burn worlds in religious ecstasy; the Astra Militarum dies in numbered millions with stoic pride; the Space Marines conduct extermination campaigns that blur genocide and salvation.
Yet Benjamin might recognize here not pure fascist propaganda, but its monstrous parody. Warhammer 40k does not present war as noble—it presents it as absurd, inevitable, and dehumanizing. The aesthetic of fascism is cranked to grotesque extremes, so that its beauty curdles. The very scale of the violence—entire planets sacrificed in minutes—dwarfs any humanist illusion. In doing so, 40k arguably aestheticizes politics to the point of self-critique. The spectacle becomes unbearable.
Still, Benjamin would likely remain ambivalent. He believed that art had revolutionary potential only when it could activate the masses politically. 40k’s excess might provoke reflection, but it may also serve as a site of pleasurable submission to spectacle. The tabletop becomes both a shrine and a stage, where the player can rehearse the tragic without ever interrupting the cycle.
V. Messianic Interruptions: Hope in the Ruin
Benjamin held that history’s redemption was not to be found in the myth of progress but in moments of rupture—in “Jetztzeit,” or “now-time”—when the continuum of history is shattered, and revolutionary time becomes possible. In Warhammer 40k, there are faint glimmers of such messianic breaks. Not in the Emperor, who is a corpse-god of failed transcendence, but in the mundane moments: a guardsman’s last stand, a Rogue Trader’s refusal to obey orders, a hive gang’s insurrection.
Even within the hobby, there may be a kind of redemptive potential. Kitbashing—a creative act where hobbyists alter or recombine miniature parts—breaks open the sanctioned image and inserts subjectivity, improvisation, and critique. Fan-made lore, alternative paint schemes, and subversive conversions constitute minor acts of resistance against the grimdark’s hegemony. They suggest that even in a universe where “there is only war,” players might imagine something else: a fragment of play, a reinterpretation of rules, an aesthetic detour.
Conclusion: Painting in the Age of Catastrophe
Walter Benjamin would likely regard Warhammer 40,000 as a vast allegory of modernity’s failure: a universe where history is catastrophe, where aura is industrialized and reconstituted, where politics is aestheticized unto death. Yet he would also attend to the strange labor of the hobbyist: the painter of plastic soldiers who, in brushing Nuln Oil into crevices and drybrushing edge highlights, enacts a ritual of historical melancholy and fragile hope.
In every painted miniature lies a contradiction: a mass product made singular, a toy made sacred, a warrior made absurd. Perhaps this, more than any lore or battle report, is where Warhammer 40k truly meets Benjamin: in the dialectical tension between destruction and preservation, repetition and ritual, reproduction and aura—in the act of painting the ruins of a world that never was, and yet somehow always has been.
Comments
Post a Comment